This is not what you said in the last request for Q1 2024 in PGM-46 so hard to assume the situation changed.
Moreover, the initial loan was meant to be without deadline, so as soon as you started to request anticipated payback, it switched to SP funding requests imo, despite also being used to reduce the loan.
Sad too see that instead of just explaining what happened with vesting which is an important topic, you just avoid it & tell me to ask again somewhere (which I did it twice already)
I wished the core team would be more transparent about this, but you right it’s not directly blocking the funding request so I’ll just have to wait until you decide to clarify I guess.
The 15% of the supply were allocated by the DAO with no clear indication about distribution & terms, so the request to ask for clarifications is more than legitimate.
Everything I received from the DAO is locked on my public ENS, with the distribution & terms well known by all.
This is totally different from any private holding I may have bought as an investor, which you learned the address about because of bug reports on your product.
The fact that you keep mentioning it & using it as an argument on public discussions despite knowing it’s unrelated & meant to be private just shows how unprofessional you are on this.
Anyway, will vote yes to not penalize other team members but very disappointed by your behavior.